Mistral Nemo vs Step 3.7 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Mistral Nemo and Step 3.7 Flash.
Mistral Nemo
A 12B parameter model with a 128k token context length built by Mistral in collaboration with NVIDIA. The model is multilingual, supporting English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese,...
Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is StepFun's latest high-efficiency multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model. It pairs a 196B-parameter language backbone with a vision encoder for native image and video understanding, activating roughly 11B parameters...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | StepFun |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2024-07-19 | 2026-05-28 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.02
Step 3.7 Flash
$0.20
Output Price per Million Tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.03
Step 3.7 Flash
$1.15
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Mistral Nemo Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Step 3.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.