โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

MiniMax M2 vs Step 3.5 Flash

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for MiniMax M2 and Step 3.5 Flash.

MiniMax

MiniMax M2

MiniMax-M2 is a compact, high-efficiency large language model optimized for end-to-end coding and agentic workflows. With 10 billion activated parameters (230 billion total), it delivers near-frontier intelligence across general reasoning,...

View Full Specs
StepFun

Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationMiniMax M2Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderMiniMaxStepFun
Context Window204,800 tokens262,144 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-10-232026-01-29

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

MiniMax M2

$0.26

Step 3.5 Flash

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

MiniMax M2

$1.02

Step 3.5 Flash

$0.30

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MiniMax M2 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Step 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.