โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax-M2.5 is a SOTA large language model designed for real-world productivity. Trained in a diverse range of complex real-world digital working environments, M2.5 builds upon the coding expertise of M2.1...

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking is a multimodal model that unifies strong text generation with visual understanding for images and videos. Its Thinking variant enhances reasoning in STEM, math, and complex tasks. It excels...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationMiniMax M2.5Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
ProviderMiniMaxAlibaba
Context Window204,800 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-122025-10-06

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

MiniMax M2.5

$0.12

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

$0.13

Output Price per Million Tokens

MiniMax M2.5

$0.48

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

$1.56

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MiniMax M2.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.