โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Mercury 2 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Detailed technical comparison between Mercury 2 (Inception AI) and GPT-5.2-Codex (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Mercury 2: 0 WinsvsGPT-5.2-Codex: 6 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-5.2-Codex

400,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Mercury 2

$0.25 / MTok
Inception AIactive

Mercury 2

Mercury 2 is an extremely fast reasoning LLM, and the first reasoning diffusion LLM (dLLM). Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...

View Mercury 2 Full Specs โ†’
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.2-Codex

GPT-5.2-Codex is an upgraded version of GPT-5.1-Codex optimized for software engineering and coding workflows. It is designed for both interactive development sessions and long, independent execution of complex engineering tasks....

View GPT-5.2-Codex Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationMercury 2GPT-5.2-Codex
ProviderInception AIOpenAI
Context Window128,000 tokens400,000 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-03-042026-01-14

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Mercury 2

$0.25

GPT-5.2-Codex

$1.75

Output Price per Million Tokens

Mercury 2

$0.75

GPT-5.2-Codex

$14.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Mercury 2 is 7.0x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.2-Codex.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.2%vs93.0%+13.8% GPT-5.2-Codex
Mercury 2
GPT-5.2-Codex ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.4%vs99.0%+21.6% GPT-5.2-Codex
Mercury 2
GPT-5.2-Codex ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.6%vs81.4%+26.8% GPT-5.2-Codex
Mercury 2
GPT-5.2-Codex ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.0%vs56.4%+16.4% GPT-5.2-Codex
Mercury 2
GPT-5.2-Codex ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.2%vs88.6%+6.4% GPT-5.2-Codex
Mercury 2
GPT-5.2-Codex ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs9.5%+1.0% GPT-5.2-Codex
Mercury 2
GPT-5.2-Codex ๐Ÿ†

Mercury 2 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-5.2-Codex Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons