โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Llama 4 Maverick vs R1 0528

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 4 Maverick and R1 0528.

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

View Full Specs
DeepSeek

R1 0528

May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationLlama 4 MaverickR1 0528
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Context Window1,048,576 tokens163,840 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-04-052025-05-28

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.15

R1 0528

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.60

R1 0528

$2.15

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

R1 0528 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.