โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Llama 4 Maverick vs MiniMax M2.5

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M2.5.

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

View Full Specs
MiniMax

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax-M2.5 is a SOTA large language model designed for real-world productivity. Trained in a diverse range of complex real-world digital working environments, M2.5 builds upon the coding expertise of M2.1...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationLlama 4 MaverickMiniMax M2.5
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Context Window1,048,576 tokens204,800 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-04-052026-02-12

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.15

MiniMax M2.5

$0.12

Output Price per Million Tokens

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.60

MiniMax M2.5

$0.48

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

MiniMax M2.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.