Llama 4 Maverick vs Step 3.7 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 4 Maverick and Step 3.7 Flash.
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta's next-generation open weights model. Delivers premium agentic capabilities, reasoning, and tool call compliance for local or self-hosted enterprise stacks.
Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is StepFun's latest high-efficiency multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model. It pairs a 196B-parameter language backbone with a vision encoder for native image and video understanding, activating roughly 11B parameters...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Llama 4 Maverick | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 89/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 300 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-05-25 | 2026-05-28 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.15
Step 3.7 Flash
$0.20
Output Price per Million Tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.60
Step 3.7 Flash
$1.15
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Self-hostable via Ollama/Docker — ideal for on-premise deployments
- ▸Requires specific system prompt for optimal function calling reliability
Step 3.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.