Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta's state-of-the-art open weights model, providing enterprise-grade reasoning and logic. Exceptionally powerful for self-hosted customer support, text generation, and tooling workflows.
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 83/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 280 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-30 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
$0.10
Mistral Medium 3.5
$1.50
Output Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
$0.32
Mistral Medium 3.5
$7.50
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Stable, well-documented self-hosted option with strong community support
- ▸Outperformed by Llama 4 Maverick for agentic tool-calling workflows
Mistral Medium 3.5 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.