โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash.

Meta

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Llama 3.2 1B is a 1-billion-parameter language model focused on efficiently performing natural language tasks, such as summarization, dialogue, and multilingual text analysis. Its smaller size allows it to operate...

View Full Specs
StepFun

Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationLlama 3.2 1B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderMetaStepFun
Context Window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-09-252026-01-29

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

$0.03

Step 3.5 Flash

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

$0.20

Step 3.5 Flash

$0.30

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Step 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.