Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Step 3.5 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 3.2 11B Vision and Step 3.5 Flash.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Meta's lightweight open weights vision model, optimized for mobile devices and local deployments. Capable of visual understanding, chart reading, and fast text generation.
Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Llama 3.2 11B Vision | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 72/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 150 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2024-09-25 | 2026-01-29 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Step 3.5 Flash
$0.10
Output Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Step 3.5 Flash
$0.30
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Lightweight vision model for edge/on-device deployments
- ▸Limited tool calling — use Llama 4 for production agentic tasks
Step 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.