Llama 3.2 11B Vision vs Llama 4 Maverick
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Llama 3.2 11B Vision and Llama 4 Maverick.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Meta's lightweight open weights vision model, optimized for mobile devices and local deployments. Capable of visual understanding, chart reading, and fast text generation.
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta's next-generation open weights model. Delivers premium agentic capabilities, reasoning, and tool call compliance for local or self-hosted enterprise stacks.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Llama 3.2 11B Vision | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 72/100 | 89/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 150 ms | 300 ms |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2024-09-25 | 2026-05-25 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.15
Output Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Llama 4 Maverick
$0.60
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Lightweight vision model for edge/on-device deployments
- ▸Limited tool calling — use Llama 4 for production agentic tasks
Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Self-hostable via Ollama/Docker — ideal for on-premise deployments
- ▸Requires specific system prompt for optimal function calling reliability