← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Jamba Large 1.7 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Detailed technical comparison between Jamba Large 1.7 (AI21 Labs) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Jamba Large 1.7: 6 WinsvsNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 0 Wins
Context Leader

Jamba Large 1.7

256,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$0.50 / MTok
AI21 Labsactive

Jamba Large 1.7

Jamba Large 1.7 is the latest model in the Jamba open family, offering improvements in grounding, instruction-following, and overall efficiency. Built on a hybrid SSM-Transformer architecture with a 256K context...

View Jamba Large 1.7 Full Specs β†’
Googleactive

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana 2," is Google’s latest state of the art image generation and editing model, delivering Pro-level visual quality at Flash speed. It combines advanced...

View Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationJamba Large 1.7Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
ProviderAI21 LabsGoogle
Context Window256,000 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-082026-06-18

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Jamba Large 1.7

$2.00

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Jamba Large 1.7

$8.00

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

$3.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 4.0x cheaper per input token than Jamba Large 1.7.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
87.8%vs75.4%+12.4% Jamba Large 1.7
Jamba Large 1.7 πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
87.0%vs71.6%+15.4% Jamba Large 1.7
Jamba Large 1.7 πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
68.2%vs41.4%+26.8% Jamba Large 1.7
Jamba Large 1.7 πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
49.6%vs28.8%+20.8% Jamba Large 1.7
Jamba Large 1.7 πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
85.4%vs76.0%+9.4% Jamba Large 1.7
Jamba Large 1.7 πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.1%vs7.9%+1.3% Jamba Large 1.7
Jamba Large 1.7 πŸ†
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Jamba Large 1.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons