โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Seed 1.6

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research) and Seed 1.6 (ByteDance). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 5 WinsvsSeed 1.6: 1 Win
Context Leader

Seed 1.6

262,144 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Seed 1.6

$0.25 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
ByteDanceactive

Seed 1.6

Seed 1.6 is a general-purpose model released by the ByteDance Seed team. It incorporates multimodal capabilities and adaptive deep thinking with a 256K context window.

View Seed 1.6 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 3 405B InstructSeed 1.6
ProviderNous ResearchByteDance
Context Window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-08-162025-12-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Seed 1.6

$0.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Seed 1.6

$2.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Seed 1.6 is 4.0x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.8%vs81.6%+2.8% Seed 1.6
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Seed 1.6 ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.0%vs76.4%+0.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Seed 1.6
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.2%vs53.6%+0.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Seed 1.6
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.6%vs39.0%+0.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Seed 1.6
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.8%vs81.2%+0.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Seed 1.6
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.4%+0.1% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Seed 1.6

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Seed 1.6 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons