โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs R1 0528

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research) and R1 0528 (DeepSeek). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 WinsvsR1 0528: 6 Wins
Context Leader

R1 0528

163,840 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

R1 0528

$0.50 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
DeepSeekactive

R1 0528

May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...

View R1 0528 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 3 405B InstructR1 0528
ProviderNous ResearchDeepSeek
Context Window131,072 tokens163,840 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-08-162025-05-28

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

R1 0528

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

R1 0528

$2.15

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: R1 0528 is 2.0x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.8%vs92.0%+13.2% R1 0528
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
R1 0528 ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.0%vs93.2%+16.2% R1 0528
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
R1 0528 ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.2%vs80.4%+26.2% R1 0528
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
R1 0528 ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.6%vs58.8%+19.2% R1 0528
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
R1 0528 ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.8%vs91.0%+9.2% R1 0528
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
R1 0528 ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs9.4%+0.9% R1 0528
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
R1 0528 ๐Ÿ†

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

R1 0528 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons