โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs o1

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research) and o1 (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Winsvso1: 6 Wins
Context Leader

o1

200,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
OpenAIactive

o1

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

View o1 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 3 405B Instructo1
ProviderNous ResearchOpenAI
Context Window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityN/A88/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A2500 ms
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-08-162024-12-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

o1

$15.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

o1

$60.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is 15.0x cheaper per input token than o1.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.8%vs91.8%+13.0% o1
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
o1 ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.0%vs94.5%+17.5% o1
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
o1 ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.2%vs94.8%+40.6% o1
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
o1 ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.6%vs78.3%+38.7% o1
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
o1 ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.8%vs92.0%+10.2% o1
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
o1 ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs9.4%+1.0% o1
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
o1 ๐Ÿ†

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

o1 Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธReasoning model โ€” high latency by design, not for real-time use
  • โ–ธBest for complex math/code reasoning where accuracy > speed
  • โ–ธUse o3-mini when you need reasoning with lower latency

Explore Other Popular Comparisons