โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research) and Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct (Meta). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 3 WinsvsLlama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct: 3 Wins
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

$0.34 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
Metaactive

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Vision is a multimodal model with 11 billion parameters, designed to handle tasks combining visual and textual data. It excels in tasks such as image captioning and...

View Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 3 405B InstructLlama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
ProviderNous ResearchMeta
Context Window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-08-162024-09-25

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

$0.34

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

$0.34

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is 2.9x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.8%vs81.2%+2.4% Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.0%vs79.4%+2.4% Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.2%vs56.6%+2.4% Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.6%vs38.6%+1.0% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.8%vs80.8%+1.0% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.3%+0.1% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons