โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research) and Llama 3.2 11B Vision (Meta). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 4 WinsvsLlama 3.2 11B Vision: 2 Wins
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Llama 3.2 11B Vision

$0.34 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
Metaactive

Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Meta's lightweight open weights vision model, optimized for mobile devices and local deployments. Capable of visual understanding, chart reading, and fast text generation.

View Llama 3.2 11B Vision Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 3 405B InstructLlama 3.2 11B Vision
ProviderNous ResearchMeta
Context Window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A72/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A150 ms
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-08-162024-09-25

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Llama 3.2 11B Vision

$0.34

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Llama 3.2 11B Vision

$0.34

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Llama 3.2 11B Vision is 2.9x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.8%vs73.0%+5.8% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.0%vs75.0%+2.0% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.2%vs58.0%+3.8% Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.6%vs38.0%+1.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.8%vs82.0%+0.2% Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs7.9%+0.5% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธLightweight vision model for edge/on-device deployments
  • โ–ธLimited tool calling โ€” use Llama 4 for production agentic tasks

Explore Other Popular Comparisons