โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Kimi K2.5

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research) and Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 WinsvsKimi K2.5: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Kimi K2.5

262,144 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Kimi K2.5

$0.57 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
Moonshot AIactive

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is Moonshot AI's native multimodal model, delivering state-of-the-art visual coding capability and a self-directed agent swarm paradigm. Built on Kimi K2 with continued pretraining over approximately 15T mixed...

View Kimi K2.5 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 3 405B InstructKimi K2.5
ProviderNous ResearchMoonshot AI
Context Window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-08-162026-01-27

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Kimi K2.5

$0.57

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Kimi K2.5

$2.85

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Kimi K2.5 is 1.8x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.8%vs82.5%+3.7% Kimi K2.5
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.0%vs83.0%+6.0% Kimi K2.5
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.2%vs59.0%+4.8% Kimi K2.5
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.6%vs41.0%+1.4% Kimi K2.5
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.8%vs84.0%+2.2% Kimi K2.5
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.8%+0.4% Kimi K2.5
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Kimi K2.5 ๐Ÿ†

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Kimi K2.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons