← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Grok Build 0.1 vs Yi-Lightning

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Grok Build 0.1 and Yi-Lightning.

xAI

Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 is xAI’s fast coding model trained specifically for agentic software engineering workflows. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is optimized for interactive coding...

View Full Specs
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Yi-Lightning is 01.AI's (零一万物) fastest and most cost-efficient model, purpose-built for high-throughput production workloads. It delivers competitive performance against GPT-4o-mini and Claude Haiku at a fraction of the cost, with exceptional bilingual Chinese-English capabilities. Yi-Lightning excels at classification, entity extraction, summarization, and high-frequency API tasks where latency and cost-per-call are critical constraints.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGrok Build 0.1Yi-Lightning
ProviderxAI01.AI
Context Window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A82/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A120 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-202025-10-01

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Grok Build 0.1

$1.00

Yi-Lightning

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

Grok Build 0.1

$2.00

Yi-Lightning

$0.30

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Grok Build 0.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Yi-Lightning Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best cost-efficiency for high-volume bilingual applications
  • Self-hostable via Ollama — excellent open-weight option for Asian-language pipelines