โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT Chat Latest vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between GPT Chat Latest (OpenAI) and GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT Chat Latest: 6 WinsvsGLM 4.7 Flash: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GPT Chat Latest

400,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT Chat Latest

GPT Chat Latest points to OpenAI's stable API alias `chat-latest` that always resolves to the latest Instant chat model used in ChatGPT. As OpenAI rolls out new Instant model updates...

View GPT Chat Latest Full Specs โ†’
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT Chat LatestGLM 4.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window400,000 tokens๐Ÿ†202,752 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-052026-01-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT Chat Latest

$5.00

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT Chat Latest

$30.00

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 83.3x cheaper per input token than GPT Chat Latest.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.8%vs77.2%+3.6% GPT Chat Latest
GPT Chat Latest ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
79.0%vs78.5%+0.5% GPT Chat Latest
GPT Chat Latest ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
56.2%vs40.0%+16.2% GPT Chat Latest
GPT Chat Latest ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.6%vs31.0%+10.6% GPT Chat Latest
GPT Chat Latest ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
80.4%vs80.0%+0.4% GPT Chat Latest
GPT Chat Latest ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs8.1%+0.5% GPT Chat Latest
GPT Chat Latest ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash

GPT Chat Latest Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons