โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT Audio vs Muse Spark 1.1

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GPT Audio and Muse Spark 1.1.

OpenAI

GPT Audio

The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...

View Full Specs
Meta

Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGPT AudioMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Context Window128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-01-192026-07-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT Audio

$2.50

Muse Spark 1.1

$1.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT Audio

$10.00

Muse Spark 1.1

$4.25

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

GPT Audio Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Muse Spark 1.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.