← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT Audio vs DeepSeek V3.1

Detailed technical comparison between GPT Audio (OpenAI) and DeepSeek V3.1 (DeepSeek). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT Audio: 0 WinsvsDeepSeek V3.1: 6 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek V3.1

163,840 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.25 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT Audio

The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...

View GPT Audio Full Specs →
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1 is a large hybrid reasoning model (671B parameters, 37B active) that supports both thinking and non-thinking modes via prompt templates. It extends the DeepSeek-V3 base with a two-phase long-context...

View DeepSeek V3.1 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT AudioDeepSeek V3.1
ProviderOpenAIDeepSeek
Context Window128,000 tokens163,840 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-01-192025-08-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT Audio

$2.50

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT Audio

$10.00

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.95

💡 Cost Ratio: DeepSeek V3.1 is 10.0x cheaper per input token than GPT Audio.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.6%vs80.0%+0.4% DeepSeek V3.1
GPT Audio
DeepSeek V3.1 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.8%vs78.2%+0.4% DeepSeek V3.1
GPT Audio
DeepSeek V3.1 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.0%vs55.4%+0.4% DeepSeek V3.1
GPT Audio
DeepSeek V3.1 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.4%vs40.8%+0.4% DeepSeek V3.1
GPT Audio
DeepSeek V3.1 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.6%vs83.0%+0.4% DeepSeek V3.1
GPT Audio
DeepSeek V3.1 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs8.6%+0.0% DeepSeek V3.1
GPT Audio
DeepSeek V3.1 🏆

GPT Audio Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

DeepSeek V3.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT Audio vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT Audio vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT Audio vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT Audio vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT Audio vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT Audio vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.