← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GPT-5.5 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

OpenAI

GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 is OpenAI’s frontier model designed for complex professional workloads, building on GPT-5.4 with stronger reasoning, higher reliability, and improved token efficiency on hard tasks. It features a 1M+ token...

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta's state-of-the-art open weights model, providing enterprise-grade reasoning and logic. Exceptionally powerful for self-hosted customer support, text generation, and tooling workflows.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGPT-5.5Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Context Window1,050,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability95/10083/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)380 ms280 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-242024-12-06

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.5

$5.00

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.5

$30.00

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.32

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
9420.0%vs8620.0%
GPT-5.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9680.0%vs8800.0%
GPT-5.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
9350.0%vs7500.0%
GPT-5.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
8420.0%vs5200.0%
GPT-5.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9900.0%vs8850.0%
GPT-5.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
970.0%vs880.0%
GPT-5.5
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

GPT-5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best for JSON schema adherence — strict mode available via response_format parameter
  • Requires explicit tool_choice for deterministic function calling

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

  • Stable, well-documented self-hosted option with strong community support
  • Outperformed by Llama 4 Maverick for agentic tool-calling workflows