← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.5 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-5.5: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-5.5

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 is OpenAI’s frontier model designed for complex professional workloads, building on GPT-5.4 with stronger reasoning, higher reliability, and improved token efficiency on hard tasks. It features a 1M+ token...

View GPT-5.5 Full Specs β†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-5.5Hermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderOpenAINous Research
Context Window1,050,000 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability95/100N/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)380 msN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-242024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.5

$5.00

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.5

$30.00

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is 5.0x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.5.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
94.2%vs78.8%+15.4% GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
96.8%vs77.0%+19.8% GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
93.5%vs54.2%+39.3% GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
84.2%vs39.6%+44.6% GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
99.0%vs81.8%+17.2% GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.7%vs8.4%+1.3% GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

GPT-5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

  • β–ΈBest for JSON schema adherence β€” strict mode available via response_format parameter
  • β–ΈRequires explicit tool_choice for deterministic function calling

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons