← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-4o-mini

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-5.2 Pro (OpenAI) and GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-5.2 Pro: 6 WinsvsGPT-4o-mini: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-5.2 Pro

400,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GPT-4o-mini

$0.15 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.2 Pro

GPT-5.2 Pro is OpenAI’s most advanced model, offering major improvements in agentic coding and long context performance over GPT-5 Pro. It is optimized for complex tasks that require step-by-step reasoning,...

View GPT-5.2 Pro Full Specs →
OpenAIactive

GPT-4o-mini

GPT-4o mini is OpenAI's newest model after [GPT-4 Omni](/models/openai/gpt-4o), supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. As their most advanced small model, it is many multiples more affordable...

View GPT-4o-mini Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-5.2 ProGPT-4o-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Context Window400,000 tokens🏆128,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A82/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A150 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-12-102024-07-18

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro

$21.00

GPT-4o-mini

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro

$168.00

GPT-4o-mini

$0.60

💡 Cost Ratio: GPT-4o-mini is 140.0x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.2 Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
91.6%vs82.0%+9.6% GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
92.8%vs84.0%+8.8% GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
80.0%vs70.2%+9.8% GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
58.4%vs45.0%+13.4% GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
90.6%vs84.7%+5.9% GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.3%vs8.6%+0.7% GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro 🏆
GPT-4o-mini

GPT-5.2 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-4o-mini Quirks & Gotchas

  • ▸Ultra-low latency — best TTFT in the OpenAI lineup
  • ▸Tool calling limited to single-step — not suitable for complex agentic pipelines

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Pro vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Pro vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Pro vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.