← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.2

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-5.2-Codex (OpenAI) and GLM 5.2 (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-5.2-Codex: 5 WinsvsGLM 5.2: 1 Win
Context Leader

GLM 5.2

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 5.2

$0.80 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.2-Codex

GPT-5.2-Codex is an upgraded version of GPT-5.1-Codex optimized for software engineering and coding workflows. It is designed for both interactive development sessions and long, independent execution of complex engineering tasks....

View GPT-5.2-Codex Full Specs →
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...

View GLM 5.2 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-5.2-CodexGLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window400,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-01-142026-06-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex

$1.75

GLM 5.2

$0.80

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex

$14.00

GLM 5.2

$2.50

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 5.2 is 2.2x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.2-Codex.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
93.0%vs89.5%+3.5% GPT-5.2-Codex
GPT-5.2-Codex 🏆
GLM 5.2
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
99.0%vs91.2%+7.8% GPT-5.2-Codex
GPT-5.2-Codex 🏆
GLM 5.2
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
81.4%vs80.5%+0.9% GPT-5.2-Codex
GPT-5.2-Codex 🏆
GLM 5.2
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
56.4%vs53.5%+2.9% GPT-5.2-Codex
GPT-5.2-Codex 🏆
GLM 5.2
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
88.6%vs89.8%+1.2% GLM 5.2
GPT-5.2-Codex
GLM 5.2 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.5%vs9.3%+0.2% GPT-5.2-Codex
GPT-5.2-Codex 🏆
GLM 5.2

GPT-5.2-Codex Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 5.2 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2-Codex vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.