← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-4o-mini

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-5.2 Chat (OpenAI) and GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-5.2 Chat: 6 WinsvsGPT-4o-mini: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GPT-4o-mini

$0.15 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.2 Chat

GPT-5.2 Chat (AKA Instant) is the fast, lightweight member of the 5.2 family, optimized for low-latency chat while retaining strong general intelligence. It uses adaptive reasoning to selectively “think” on...

View GPT-5.2 Chat Full Specs →
OpenAIactive

GPT-4o-mini

GPT-4o mini is OpenAI's newest model after [GPT-4 Omni](/models/openai/gpt-4o), supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. As their most advanced small model, it is many multiples more affordable...

View GPT-4o-mini Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-5.2 ChatGPT-4o-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Context Window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A82/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A150 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-12-102024-07-18

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat

$1.75

GPT-4o-mini

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.2 Chat

$14.00

GPT-4o-mini

$0.60

💡 Cost Ratio: GPT-4o-mini is 11.7x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.2 Chat.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
90.4%vs82.0%+8.4% GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
91.6%vs84.0%+7.6% GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
78.8%vs70.2%+8.6% GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
57.2%vs45.0%+12.2% GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
89.4%vs84.7%+4.7% GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat 🏆
GPT-4o-mini
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.2%vs8.6%+0.6% GPT-5.2 Chat
GPT-5.2 Chat 🏆
GPT-4o-mini

GPT-5.2 Chat Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-4o-mini Quirks & Gotchas

  • ▸Ultra-low latency — best TTFT in the OpenAI lineup
  • ▸Tool calling limited to single-step — not suitable for complex agentic pipelines

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.2 Chat vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.