← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.1 vs GLM 5.2

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) and GLM 5.2 (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-5.1: 4 WinsvsGLM 5.2: 2 Wins
Context Leader

GLM 5.2

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 5.2

$0.80 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.1

GPT-5.1 is the latest frontier-grade model in the GPT-5 series, offering stronger general-purpose reasoning, improved instruction adherence, and a more natural conversational style compared to GPT-5. It uses adaptive reasoning...

View GPT-5.1 Full Specs →
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...

View GLM 5.2 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-5.1GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window400,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-11-132026-06-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.1

$1.25

GLM 5.2

$0.80

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.1

$10.00

GLM 5.2

$2.52

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 5.2 is 1.6x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.1.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
93.2%vs89.5%+3.7% GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 🏆
GLM 5.2
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
94.4%vs91.2%+3.2% GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 🏆
GLM 5.2
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
81.6%vs80.5%+1.1% GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 🏆
GLM 5.2
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
56.6%vs53.5%+3.1% GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 🏆
GLM 5.2
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
88.8%vs89.8%+1.0% GLM 5.2
GPT-5.1
GLM 5.2 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.1%vs9.3%+0.2% GLM 5.2
GPT-5.1
GLM 5.2 🏆

GPT-5.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 5.2 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.1 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.1 vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.1 vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-5.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.