โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-4o-mini Search Preview vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-4o-mini Search Preview (OpenAI) and GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-4o-mini Search Preview: 1 WinvsGLM 4.7 Flash: 5 Wins
Context Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

202,752 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-4o-mini Search Preview

GPT-4o mini Search Preview is a specialized model for web search in Chat Completions. It is trained to understand and execute web search queries.

View GPT-4o-mini Search Preview Full Specs โ†’
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-4o-mini Search PreviewGLM 4.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window128,000 tokens202,752 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-03-122026-01-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-4o-mini Search Preview

$0.15

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-4o-mini Search Preview

$0.60

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 2.5x cheaper per input token than GPT-4o-mini Search Preview.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.4%vs77.2%+3.8% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
GLM 4.7 Flash ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.6%vs78.5%+8.9% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
GLM 4.7 Flash ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.8%vs40.0%+2.8% GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
30.2%vs31.0%+0.8% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
GLM 4.7 Flash ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.4%vs80.0%+2.6% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
GLM 4.7 Flash ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.1%+0.1% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-4o-mini Search Preview
GLM 4.7 Flash ๐Ÿ†

GPT-4o-mini Search Preview Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons