← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-4o (2024-11-20) (OpenAI) and GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-4o (2024-11-20): 5 WinsvsGLM 4.7 Flash: 1 Win
Context Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

202,752 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

The 2024-11-20 version of GPT-4o offers a leveled-up creative writing ability with more natural, engaging, and tailored writing to improve relevance & readability. It’s also better at working with uploaded...

View GPT-4o (2024-11-20) Full Specs β†’
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GLM 4.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window128,000 tokens202,752 tokensπŸ†
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-11-202026-01-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

$2.50

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

$10.00

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 41.7x cheaper per input token than GPT-4o (2024-11-20).

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs77.2%+1.2% GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) πŸ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs78.5%+1.9% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GLM 4.7 Flash πŸ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs40.0%+13.8% GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) πŸ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs31.0%+8.2% GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) πŸ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs80.0%+1.4% GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) πŸ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.1%+0.3% GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) πŸ†
GLM 4.7 Flash

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons