← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI) and GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-4.1 Nano: 6 WinsvsGLM 4.7 Flash: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-4.1 Nano

1,047,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-4.1 Nano

For tasks that demand low latency, GPT‑4.1 nano is the fastest and cheapest model in the GPT-4.1 series. It delivers exceptional performance at a small size with its 1 million...

View GPT-4.1 Nano Full Specs →
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-4.1 NanoGLM 4.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window1,047,576 tokens🏆202,752 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-04-142026-01-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-4.1 Nano

$0.10

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-4.1 Nano

$0.40

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 1.7x cheaper per input token than GPT-4.1 Nano.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.4%vs77.2%+3.2% GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.6%vs78.5%+0.1% GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.8%vs40.0%+15.8% GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.2%vs31.0%+10.2% GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.4%vs80.0%+3.4% GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs8.1%+0.5% GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 Nano 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash

GPT-4.1 Nano Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.