← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-3.5 Turbo (OpenAI) and GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-3.5 Turbo: 5 WinsvsGLM 4.7 Flash: 1 Win
Context Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

202,752 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-3.5 Turbo

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

View GPT-3.5 Turbo Full Specs →
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-3.5 TurboGLM 4.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Context Window16,385 tokens202,752 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2023-05-282026-01-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo

$0.50

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo

$1.50

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 8.3x cheaper per input token than GPT-3.5 Turbo.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.4%vs77.2%+2.2% GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.6%vs78.5%+0.9% GLM 4.7 Flash
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GLM 4.7 Flash 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.8%vs40.0%+14.8% GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.2%vs31.0%+9.2% GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.4%vs80.0%+2.4% GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs8.1%+0.4% GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo 🏆
GLM 4.7 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.