← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs Yi-Lightning

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Yi-Lightning.

OpenAI

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

View Full Specs
01.AI

Yi-Lightning

Yi-Lightning is 01.AI's (離一万物) fastest and most cost-efficient model, purpose-built for high-throughput production workloads. It delivers competitive performance against GPT-4o-mini and Claude Haiku at a fraction of the cost, with exceptional bilingual Chinese-English capabilities. Yi-Lightning excels at classification, entity extraction, summarization, and high-frequency API tasks where latency and cost-per-call are critical constraints.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Yi-Lightning
ProviderOpenAI01.AI
Context Window4,095 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A82/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A120 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-01-252025-10-01

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

$1.00

Yi-Lightning

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)

$2.00

Yi-Lightning

$0.30

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Yi-Lightning Quirks & Gotchas

  • β–ΈBest cost-efficiency for high-volume bilingual applications
  • β–ΈSelf-hostable via Ollama β€” excellent open-weight option for Asian-language pipelines