← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k (OpenAI) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

This model offers four times the context length of gpt-3.5-turbo, allowing it to support approximately 20 pages of text in a single request at a higher cost. Training data: up...

View GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderOpenAINvidia
Context Window16,385 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2023-08-282026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

$3.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

$4.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$2.20

💡 Cost Ratio: Nemotron 3 Ultra is 6.0x cheaper per input token than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.4%vs87.8%+8.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.6%vs87.0%+9.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.8%vs68.2%+13.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.2%vs49.6%+9.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.4%vs85.4%+3.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs9.1%+0.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.