GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Llama 3.2 11B Vision.
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
This model offers four times the context length of gpt-3.5-turbo, allowing it to support approximately 20 pages of text in a single request at a higher cost. Training data: up...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Meta's lightweight open weights vision model, optimized for mobile devices and local deployments. Capable of visual understanding, chart reading, and fast text generation.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k | Llama 3.2 11B Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Context Window | 16,385 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 72/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 150 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2023-08-28 | 2024-09-25 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
$3.00
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Output Price per Million Tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
$4.00
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Lightweight vision model for edge/on-device deployments
- ▸Limited tool calling — use Llama 4 for production agentic tasks