โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GLM 5.2 vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between GLM 5.2 (Zhipu AI) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GLM 5.2: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GLM 5.2

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 5.2

$0.80 / MTok
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...

View GLM 5.2 Full Specs โ†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGLM 5.2Hermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderZhipu AINous Research
Context Window1,048,576 tokens๐Ÿ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-06-162024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GLM 5.2

$0.80

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

GLM 5.2

$2.52

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: GLM 5.2 is 1.2x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
89.5%vs78.8%+10.7% GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
91.2%vs77.0%+14.2% GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
80.5%vs54.2%+26.3% GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
53.5%vs39.6%+13.9% GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
89.8%vs81.8%+8.0% GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.3%vs8.4%+0.9% GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 ๐Ÿ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

GLM 5.2 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons