GLM 5.1 vs R1 0528
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 5.1 and R1 0528.
GLM 5.1
GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...
R1 0528
May 28th update to the [original DeepSeek R1](/deepseek/deepseek-r1) Performance on par with [OpenAI o1](/openai/o1), but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens. It's 671B parameters in size, with 37B active...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GLM 5.1 | R1 0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | DeepSeek |
| Context Window | 202,752 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-07 | 2025-05-28 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$0.97
R1 0528
$0.50
Output Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$3.04
R1 0528
$2.15
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GLM 5.1 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
R1 0528 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.