GLM 5.1 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 5.1 and Mistral Small 3.1 24B.
GLM 5.1
GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is an upgraded variant of Mistral Small 3 (2501), featuring 24 billion parameters with advanced multimodal capabilities. It provides state-of-the-art performance in text-based reasoning and...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GLM 5.1 | Mistral Small 3.1 24B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Mistral |
| Context Window | 202,752 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-07 | 2025-03-17 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$0.97
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
$0.35
Output Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$3.04
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
$0.56
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GLM 5.1 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.