GLM 5.1 vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 5.1 and Llama 3.2 11B Vision.
GLM 5.1
GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Meta's lightweight open weights vision model, optimized for mobile devices and local deployments. Capable of visual understanding, chart reading, and fast text generation.
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GLM 5.1 | Llama 3.2 11B Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Meta |
| Context Window | 202,752 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | 72/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | 150 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-07 | 2024-09-25 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$0.97
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Output Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$3.04
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
$0.34
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GLM 5.1 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Lightweight vision model for edge/on-device deployments
- ▸Limited tool calling — use Llama 4 for production agentic tasks