GLM 5.1 vs Kimi K2.6
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 5.1 and Kimi K2.6.
GLM 5.1
GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on...
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's next-generation multimodal model, designed for long-horizon coding, coding-driven UI/UX generation, and multi-agent orchestration. It handles complex end-to-end coding tasks across Python, Rust, and Go, and...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GLM 5.1 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Moonshot AI |
| Context Window | 202,752 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-07 | 2026-04-20 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$0.97
Kimi K2.6
$0.66
Output Price per Million Tokens
GLM 5.1
$3.04
Kimi K2.6
$3.41
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GLM 5.1 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Kimi K2.6 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.