← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GLM 4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between GLM 4.7 (Zhipu AI) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GLM 4.7: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7

$0.40 / MTok
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7

GLM-4.7 is Z.ai’s latest flagship model, featuring upgrades in two key areas: enhanced programming capabilities and more stable multi-step reasoning/execution. It demonstrates significant improvements in executing complex agent tasks while...

View GLM 4.7 Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGLM 4.7Nemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderZhipu AINvidia
Context Window204,800 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-12-222026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.7

$0.40

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.7

$1.75

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$2.20

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 is 1.3x cheaper per input token than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
81.5%vs87.8%+6.3% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
82.0%vs87.0%+5.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
51.5%vs68.2%+16.7% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
38.0%vs49.6%+11.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.5%vs85.4%+1.9% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.7%vs9.1%+0.5% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

GLM 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.