← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GLM 4.6V vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between GLM 4.6V (Zhipu AI) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GLM 4.6V: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.6V

$0.30 / MTok
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.6V

GLM-4.6V is a large multimodal model designed for high-fidelity visual understanding and long-context reasoning across images, documents, and mixed media. It supports up to 128K tokens, processes complex page layouts...

View GLM 4.6V Full Specs →
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGLM 4.6VHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderZhipu AINous Research
Context Window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-12-082024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.6V

$0.30

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.6V

$0.90

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 4.6V is 3.3x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.6%vs78.8%+0.8% GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.8%vs77.0%+0.8% GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.0%vs54.2%+0.8% GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.4%vs39.6%+0.8% GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.6%vs81.8%+0.8% GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs8.4%+0.1% GLM 4.6V
GLM 4.6V 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

GLM 4.6V Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.6V vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.6V vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.6V vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.6V vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.