GLM 4.6 vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 4.6 and Hunyuan A13B Instruct.
GLM 4.6
Compared with GLM-4.5, this generation brings several key improvements: Longer context window: The context window has been expanded from 128K to 200K tokens, enabling the model to handle more complex...
Hunyuan A13B Instruct
Hunyuan-A13B is a 13B active parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model developed by Tencent, with a total parameter count of 80B and support for reasoning via Chain-of-Thought. It offers competitive benchmark...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GLM 4.6 | Hunyuan A13B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | Tencent |
| Context Window | 202,752 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-09-30 | 2025-07-08 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GLM 4.6
$0.43
Hunyuan A13B Instruct
$0.14
Output Price per Million Tokens
GLM 4.6
$1.74
Hunyuan A13B Instruct
$0.57
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GLM 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Hunyuan A13B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.