โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GLM 4.5V vs Llama 4 Maverick

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 4.5V and Llama 4 Maverick.

Zhipu AI

GLM 4.5V

GLM-4.5V is a vision-language foundation model for multimodal agent applications. Built on a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 106B parameters and 12B activated parameters, it achieves state-of-the-art results in video understanding,...

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGLM 4.5VLlama 4 Maverick
ProviderZhipu AIMeta
Context Window65,536 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-112025-04-05

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.5V

$0.60

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.5V

$1.80

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.60

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

GLM 4.5V Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 4 Maverick Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.