GLM 4.5 Air vs MiniMax M2.1
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for GLM 4.5 Air and MiniMax M2.1.
GLM 4.5 Air
GLM-4.5-Air is the lightweight variant of our latest flagship model family, also purpose-built for agent-centric applications. Like GLM-4.5, it adopts the Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture but with a more compact parameter...
MiniMax M2.1
MiniMax-M2.1 is a lightweight, state-of-the-art large language model optimized for coding, agentic workflows, and modern application development. With only 10 billion activated parameters, it delivers a major jump in real-world...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | GLM 4.5 Air | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | MiniMax |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-07-25 | 2025-12-23 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
GLM 4.5 Air
$0.13
MiniMax M2.1
$0.30
Output Price per Million Tokens
GLM 4.5 Air
$0.85
MiniMax M2.1
$1.20
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
GLM 4.5 Air Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
MiniMax M2.1 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.