โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Google

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B Thinking is a multimodal model that unifies strong text generation with visual understanding across images and video. The Thinking model is optimized for multimodal reasoning in STEM and math....

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemma 4 31BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Context Window262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-022025-09-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 31B

$0.12

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

$0.26

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 31B

$0.35

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

$2.60

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemma 4 31B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.