โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.6 Flash.

Google

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash is a fast, efficient language model from Alibaba's Qwen 3.6 series. It supports text, image, and video input with a 1M token context window. Tiered pricing kicks in...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemma 4 31BQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Context Window262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-022026-04-27

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 31B

$0.12

Qwen3.6 Flash

$0.19

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 31B

$0.35

Qwen3.6 Flash

$1.13

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemma 4 31B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen3.6 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.