← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 4 31B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Gemma 4 31B (Google) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemma 4 31B: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemma 4 31B

$0.12 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemma 4 31B

Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...

View Gemma 4 31B Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemma 4 31BNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderGoogleNvidia
Context Window262,144 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-022026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 31B

$0.12

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.60

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 31B

$0.37

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$3.60

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemma 4 31B is 5.0x cheaper per input token than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.4%vs87.8%+7.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.6%vs87.0%+8.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.8%vs68.2%+12.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.2%vs49.6%+8.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.4%vs85.4%+2.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs9.1%+0.5% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

Gemma 4 31B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 4 31B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 4 31B vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 4 31B vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 4 31B vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.