Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is a reasoning-first chat model in the Qwen3-Next line that outputs structured “thinking” traces by default. It’s designed for hard multi-step problems; math proofs, code synthesis/debugging, logic, and agentic...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Context Window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-03 | 2025-09-11 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.06
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
$0.10
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.33
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
$0.78
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 4 26B A4B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.