โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder Next.

Google

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference โ€” delivering near-31B quality at...

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open-weight causal language model optimized for coding agents and local development workflows. It uses a sparse MoE design with 80B total parameters and only 3B activated per...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationGemma 4 26B A4BQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Context Window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-032026-02-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.06

Qwen3 Coder Next

$0.11

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.33

Qwen3 Coder Next

$0.80

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Gemma 4 26B A4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen3 Coder Next Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.